View of the Song of Peace from Other Side of Strong Bridge

View of the Song of Peace from Other Side of Strong Bridge

SONG NAIL; within is the CYCLE OF WISDOM  (Song 6:9 supposedly written by Peace “Solomon about 1,000 BC in Palestine)

These are the original word meanings

3123 dove  259  united  259 united  517 mother  1249 beloved  3205 to bear   7200  see   4436 queeen  6370 concubine 1984 be clear

This is how the INTERPRETERS rendered it in the KJB

Song 6:9 KJB – My dove,[H3123] my undefiled is [but] one;[H259] she [is] the [only] one[H259] of her mother,[H517] she [is] the choice[H1249] [one] of her that bare[H3205] her. The daughters saw[H7200] her, and blessed her; [yea], the queens[H4436] and the concubines,[H6370] and they praised[H1984] her.

Who/what is the Queen?  Who/what is the mother?  Why is Queen a feminine word; but mother is not?  What is the concubine that is clear? bridge with red heifers crossing opposite directsion The new STRONG BRIDGE DATABASE; enables us to quickly and easily discover the meaning of any word in the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance.  No longer do we have to labor to discover the meaning of any word.  We can see how any word was formed all the way down to its root.  We no longer have to be confused as to what the author meant.  Nor wonder why our current understanding of a word meaning does not seem to match the old texts.  Perhaps it is our current view and understanding that is at faulty.

The above example is just the meaning of the specific words….the SBD gives the entire structure of any given word;  right down to its root.  IN addition shows all the words that grown from any given root word.  This facilitates understanding of what the original authros were conveying.

While 8673 words int he Old Testament were identified by numbers; many of them are duplicates due to transliteration differences due to different times and places.

In addition to these 8673 words there is a substantial number of words that were not given numbers.  These words are contained within the numbered words.  Often the meaning was given; which adds tremendously to our understanding of the original texts.

When we remove all the references to the OT words that are found in the New Testament; there is nothing left of the NEW TESTAMENT. When we explore the scripture with ONLY THE ORIGINAL WORD MEANINGS  (that is without all the added English words)  we see stories quite differently then what has been taught for hundreds of years.

We see stories that are common to man’s understanding of the cosmos; the universe, the creation.  We see glimpses of the first science, the science of the sun, moon, stars and their relationship to the earth.

A very narrow view as traveling was slow; mostly on foot.  Some times on donkeys, horse, camels, etc; but still slow.  There was no far distant other side of the planet.  There was however, the vast upper region that seemed to dance, revolve around the earth itself.

When we distort those stories into people; we lose the entire purpose of the writings of the original authors. It is time to reclaim what the original authors scribed;  must have been important to have been selected as the basis for the book that has sold more copies than any other.  It is estimated that if all the Bible that have been sold were stacked up; it would make a mountain 100 times taller than Mt. Everest. Maybe we should put some time and effort into understanding what the authors of the 66 books actually put on paper.

Other Side of Bridge vs Interpretation

View from Other Side of the Bridge bc

as translated through the words used by the original author.

WORD MEANINGS…..father of knowledge is the builder of a multitude of nations (via mother) perfume.

1. FIRST was written in 1688BC author unknown.
2. OXHEAD WORD OF HOT DAY written between 1279 and 461BC in Palestine.

View From the Interpretation of 1640 ad

as seen through the interpreters of the Bible

1. Abidah is the son of Abraham through the mother Ketura  Gen.25:4  1688BC
2. Abida is the son of Abraham through the mother Ketura 1 Chron. 1:33

Which view do we choose to see?  Why would we choose another?

The Strong Bridge Database gives us an easy way to view the original meanings of the words used by the original authors of the 66 books upon which the Bible is built.

Using the Strong Bridge Database we can then compare with the INTERPRETATIONS….of the KJB written in the 1600s ad and the original word meanings.  We can then draw our own conclusions about the intent of the authors of the original 66 books.  66 books selected by the interpreters to sustain the teachings prevalent at the time.

Any other interpretation would either have been

  1. Rejected by the general public;  most of whom could neither read nor write.
  2. Or the general public would have run away from the popularly held beliefs and discovered a different view of the original text.

Words do not lie; however humans concocted words and thenuse them to create whatever pictures they desire for other to see.

 

Sun Dog Star Caleb Descended

existent open wide free dog (star) descended.
versus the Bible story about 2 men Joshua and Caleb who crossed the Jordan River

The dog star, the sun star,  was renamed Serius by the Greeks and the Bible interpreters called it Caleb.  All English renditions of the Bible state they are translated from the KING JAMES BIBLE according to the  GREEK.

The original stories were not written Greek.  They were written, mostly in Hebrew with words from the languages of  Babylonian, Chaldean, Hebrew, Aramaic, Egyptian, Persian and a variety of other languages; some unidentified.

So let us look at another story about the existent open wide free dog (star) from the original text..

existent open wide free builds perpetuity….dog(star) builds, (what) will be prepared
vs Joshua the son of Nun….Caleb the son of Jephunneh.

Which view the original text or the religious myth view gives us the most information?  Let us look at a specific scripture.

Numbers 26:65 For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save…Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.

If the  existent open wide free dog(star) was all that was left….then there was still  the sun in the heavens.

  1. If Caleb and Joshua were the only  human male beings left….how did they reproduce themselves?
  2. How do two male persons bring forth life?   In order to answer this question; other myths have to be created to substantiate the religious myth that the existent open wide free dog(star) was two male persons.

What if we use the original viewpoint and let the words of the original text tell us their stories?  Instead of the long held religious viewpoint that existed long before the first Bible was released to the general public.  Evidences exist all over the world’ cathedrals, monasteries with depictions of Crucifixions built long before the Bible was developed for the masses.

The Bible was simply a way to reinforce the long held religious beliefs and a way to keep the masses aligned with those beliefs….saying this book is the WORD OF GOD and MUST BE OBEYED.  Question is which God?  Whose God?

Thus 1100+ interpretations of the Bible trying to figure out how to obey something that seems so contrary.  Something that is interpreted by thousands of different denominations and non-denominations, as well as the general public.  None agreeing with each other; just what we are to obey.

The new database will make this a much simpler task.  The information at the back of the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance, the numbering reference system is being brought into a a different format….same information….just much simpler, faster and easier to use than the hard copy.

Everyone can search for themselves and decide what they choose to believe….the long held religious myths about  human beings or the beautiful stories about creation and its processes.

This database does not replace the hard copy; but is an addendum to it, to facilitate an easier way to explore, so each one can come to their own conclusions.  There is only one of us. one human race; time for us to get it together.  Not as clones; but as beautiful individual expressions of creation.  Everything is our elder and we the little kid on the block have much to learn.

We will be able to pull up all sorts of data, such as the primitive root words and see what grows on them.  Compare them at a glance.  We will not find oranges growing on grape vines; nor apples on a cherry tree.

For the first time we will be able to pull up all of the unused root words; which were not assigned a number by the JSE team; but were identified and the meanings of those unused root words was given.  Now they can be broken out and see what grows on them.

We will be able to pull out all of the puncturedfemale and rememberedmale words and see they gave absolutely nothing to do with gender.  Have everything to do with form and function and how the authors used the same words in different ways.

There are not many words in the original texts; just a lot of repetitions…these can now be reduced down into a simple dictionary of the simple meanings of the original text.

What is a Cult?

“What is a cult? The greatest authority on the cults, the late Dr. Walter Martin, described a cult as “A group of people gathered around a specific person’s misinterpretation of the Bible.”{2} Cults are groups that claim to be in harmony with Christianity but deny foundational Christian doctrines such as the Trinity or the unique deity of Jesus Christ.”

To this quote above….this reply…..every single group of people gathered around a book called Bible, have created a cult.

There are no translations of the original text…..there are only INTERPRETATIONS and every new Bible interpretation states clearly that is a translation based on the previous Bibles.

So long as we continue to look from the posture of the words used in the Bible….we will see the same scenes, hear the same sounds…believe the same as the previous generations.

The new DATABASE about to be released allows us to see from a different viewpoint.  The  viewpoint has been around for more than a hundred years…the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance.   However wonderful, marvelous this work is….it is cumbersome to use…..takes hours just to track down the original word meanings in any scripture….by the time an hour has passed, the eyes are glazed and the beginning point is in a fog.

The JSE is a strong bridge between the English words used in the Bible and the meanings of the original text.  It will now be possible to actually pull it all together with the incredible tool called the web world.

This DATABASE is not new information; but  rearranged in a different way, a different sorting system to look at the gift (Matthew) given of light (Luke) in the mid 1800s; by a team of more than 100 people.  People desiring to know what the original text ACTUALLY SAID.

There are very few words in the original 66 books…very few words and when we reduce the duplications; there are even fewer word.  Duplications appear, due to different authors in different time frames and different places on the planet…..plus…. the nature of language to evolve, change, grow, evolve…as a result wwe have far fewer words to work with.

A dictionary is evolving from this new DATABASE.  A dictionary that contains only the word meanings of the original text.

If the stories that have been perpetrated as the stories of the Bible cannot be retold USING ONLY  the true meanings of the origInal text.found in this new dictionary….then those stories did not exist at the time of writing.  Which means those biblical stories bandied about as originating in the original text are based on false beliefs of the cults that perpetrate them.

One of the biggest stumbling blocks is the fact, capital letters are not a function of the older languages….English introduced that into the Bible.

Another big stumbling  block is gender based stories.   It is quite obvious that today we have no concept of the function of neutral, punctured and remembered words; otherwise designated as neutral, female and male words.

Clearly a word that means FATHER OF DEW; but is identified in Biblical stories as the female gender wife of a male gender person…..causes one to stop and wonder!!!!!!

A word that means SUNLIGHT is designated by English in the Bible as a male human person.  When we use the word SUNLIGHT instead of the name of a human being; we see a far different light beam.  A light beam with great strength.

With this new DATABASE we can easily pull up the very few remembered words and the somewhat more prolific punctured words and clearly see there is no gender.  When we open our eyes further we see the creative process in those words.

English functions on a totally different scale than the original languages, which were used to record the words of the 66 books; the basis of the Bible.

Christianity teaches that we are not to point fingers at each other; condemn each other, judge each other; but to love, honor, respect each other.

Cults by any  name set themselves apart as if they are more special than any other cult.

The truth makes us free; it does not set us free….we are already living the open wide free existent; otherwise words capilitized and  interpreted as the names of several different persons in the Bible, such as Jesus, Joshua, Jehosuah, Jehoshuah, etc.

Somewhere between 781 and 711BC in a place called Palestine; a person scribed these words.

“People perish for lack of knowledge”; …..gnosis; knowing the truth.  If we look at the original word meanings we discover  this was scribed by the deliverer door with a nail inside……..English interpretation is Hosea 4:6

The deliverer is a word that is created from a root word meaning open, wide, free…(the same as Jesus, Joshua, Jehoshuah, Jehoshua, etc..  Capital letters added by English and other capitalized based languages.

Amongst many other functions, the DATABASE  will allow us to pull up the primary/primitive root words and see ALL OF THE OTHER WORDS that grow from the primary/primitive root.  Then we can use the proper meaning in the scriptures where it belongs.

For example, the many many words that grow from the FIRST FATHER,  (the aleph, elpeh, alpha, a,A….father of language) reveals much.  Cultish thinking keeps us locked into seeing the word father as something quite different than it was in the setting of the writings 1845BC to 70AD.

The same way it keeps us locked into a view of the TRANSLITERATED LETTERS j e s u s.

Question!  How many sermons have been preached telling us that the FIRST FATHER is the first letter of any given language?

Question?  How many sermons have been preached on Hermes,  the author, the father  of the Egyptian Emerald Tablet?  It is in the Bible.

How many sermons have been preached on Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, the 12 houses of the zodiac?  ……on Venus, the bright and the morning star?

How many crosses have been thrown up defending against these words due to religious habit.  They are all in the Bible and their meanings are clouded by religious stories without any foundation.

N-3314 Midday

N-3314 Midday

Bible interpreters decided that a word meaning midday should be interpreted as NOON and SOUTH .

To be a translated word requires the meaning to be retained in the new language.  Midday expressed as NOON is an example of an interpretation.  An interpretation that is not, in this case,  misleading.

However using the word SOUTH where MIDDAY was used in the original text, is misleading at the very least.

Which of us would read the English word SOUTH and come to the conclusion that it meant MIDDAY?  Would there be even one person that would arrive at this conclusion?

We can dissect the baked cake.  Use a microscope of the highest power and never see the eggs, shortening, salt, sugar, milk, vanilla, flour, etc.  The same is true when we try to understand the original text by dissecting the English words that were used in the Bible.   Many of them unrepresentative and even contrary to the original meanings.

The following graphic shows how the word MIDDAY was formed.  Part of the formation is  a PUNCTUREDfemale  word.  These types of words have nothing to do with gender.  They do, however express something very clearly.

This is one example of how the database will easily give us information so that we can individually decide whether or not the Bible is an accurate document.  I have no intention of making that decision for anyone.  Have full intention of providing a valuable precious gift to the world.  Who chooses to open the gift remains to be seen.

Take a look at the graphic and how this word was formed.  This is a very simple word; some words are very complicated in their formation.  Examples of that will appear in the future.
(more…)

Religious Boogeyman Satan

Where does the word Satan come from?

In the original text of the OLD Testament there a word that means opponent is TRANSLITERATED into the letters s a t a n.  Religious interpreters of the New Testament made the s a capital letter and treated the four letters as a word, i.e Satan.

Transliterated letters are not words.  They are symbolic of the original word.  We use this all the time in going back and forth between languages.

To be translated the letters s a t a n must result in a word that is equal to opponent.

When the letter s was made a capital letter it inferred in English that it was the name of a person, place or important thing.  Religion teaches that the word Satan is a spiritual being that desires to destroy humans.  Cannot answer the question, who/what created Satan?  Or at best says that God made Satan to teach us lessons.

Interestingly another word that means hurtful was INTERPRETED as meaning a masculine devil.   But  these words were used  in the Bible…bad, evil, grievous, harm, lewd, malicious, wicked, wickedness.  Wonder why  masculine devil was not used? These are English chosen words they are not word meanings taken from the original text. (more…)